Miro vs Softr

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Softr (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 38). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is clearly ahead of Softr. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Softr. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Softr is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Softr is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Softr is ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Miro's footprint is roughly 843.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Softr looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.