Visual workspace for innovation
Miro vs Talend
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Talend both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Miro and Talend sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (38), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Talend. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Talend. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is ahead of Talend. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Talend is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Talend is ahead of Miro.
Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Talend shows 486 stars across 148 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors.
Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Talend looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Miro | Talend |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 38 |
| Code | 58 | 51 |
| Education | 86 | 57 |
| Community | 32 | 23 |
| Reach | 0 | 35 |
| Momentum | 8 | 26 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 843 | 486 |
| Forks | 380 | 657 |
| Public repos | 45 | 148 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 13 |
| External contributors | 6 | 9 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 34 |