Miro vs Perk

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Perk (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 38). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of Perk. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Perk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Perk is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is clearly ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Miro's footprint is roughly 24.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Perk looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.