Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users.
Mixpanel, Inc vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Mixpanel, Inc (Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users.) and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Mixpanel, Inc (rank #82) holds a meaningful lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (57 vs 33). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mixpanel, Inc is slightly ahead of Sage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mixpanel, Inc is ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mixpanel, Inc is ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sage is slightly ahead of Mixpanel, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Mixpanel, Inc is clearly ahead of Sage.
Mixpanel, Inc carries 5,611 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 51 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
Mixpanel, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Mixpanel, Inc | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #82 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 57 | 33 |
| Code | 58 | 56 |
| Education | 70 | 52 |
| Community | 45 | 34 |
| Reach | 15 | 23 |
| Momentum | 48 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,611 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 2,660 | 430 |
| Public repos | 84 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 51 | 6 |
| External contributors | 21 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 58 | 38 |