Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com
Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
monday.com vs ReadMe
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
monday.com (Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com) and ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
monday.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over ReadMe (rank #257) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 47). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of monday.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of monday.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), monday.com is slightly ahead of ReadMe. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), monday.com is ahead of ReadMe. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of monday.com.
monday.com carries 1,854 GitHub stars across 46 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors on record. ReadMe shows 1,824 stars across 106 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
monday.com is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. ReadMe looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | monday.com | ReadMe |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #257 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 47 |
| Code | 62 | 76 |
| Education | 52 | 79 |
| Community | 51 | 43 |
| Reach | 38 | 26 |
| Momentum | 30 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,854 | 1,824 |
| Forks | 807 | 451 |
| Public repos | 46 | 106 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 26 |
| External contributors | 20 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 74 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 51 | 48 |