Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com
monday.com vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
monday.com (Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
monday.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Recurly (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 44). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is slightly ahead of monday.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recurly is slightly ahead of monday.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), monday.com is ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), monday.com is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of monday.com.
monday.com carries 1,854 GitHub stars across 46 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
monday.com is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | monday.com | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 44 |
| Code | 62 | 68 |
| Education | 52 | 57 |
| Community | 51 | 34 |
| Reach | 38 | 7 |
| Momentum | 30 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,854 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 807 | 700 |
| Public repos | 46 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 26 |
| External contributors | 20 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 51 | 37 |