Moodle Development vs Thomson Reuters

Moodle Development and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Moodle Development and Thomson Reuters sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Thomson Reuters is slightly ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Moodle Development.

Moodle Development carries 7,373 GitHub stars across 15 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 438 stars across 144 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Moodle Development's footprint is roughly 16.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Moodle Development is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Thomson Reuters looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.