Moodle Development vs Userlike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Moodle Development and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Userlike (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 34). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is clearly ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Userlike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Userlike.
Moodle Development carries 7,353 GitHub stars across 15 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Moodle Development's footprint is roughly 193.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Moodle Development is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Moodle Development | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #602 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 35 |
| Code | 43 | 43 |
| Education | 45 | 85 |
| Community | 39 | 12 |
| Reach | 26 | 20 |
| Momentum | 13 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,353 | 38 |
| Forks | 8,234 | 5 |
| Public repos | 15 | 14 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 3 |
| External contributors | 25 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 36 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 25 | 35 |