mParticle by Rokt vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
mParticle by Rokt and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Recurly's footprint is roughly 4.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | mParticle by Rokt | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 44 |
| Code | 59 | 68 |
| Education | 63 | 57 |
| Community | 38 | 34 |
| Reach | 28 | 7 |
| Momentum | 27 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 317 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 521 | 700 |
| Public repos | 85 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 26 |
| External contributors | 21 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 37 |