mParticle by Rokt vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
mParticle by Rokt and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 42). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but RingCentral, Inc. 's footprint is roughly 5.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | mParticle by Rokt | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 59 |
| Education | 63 | 52 |
| Community | 38 | 42 |
| Reach | 28 | 23 |
| Momentum | 27 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 317 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 521 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 85 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 31 |
| External contributors | 21 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 48 |