We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
mParticle by Rokt vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
mParticle by Rokt and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Semrush. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Semrush looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | mParticle by Rokt | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 44 |
| Code | 59 | 44 |
| Education | 63 | 65 |
| Community | 38 | 36 |
| Reach | 28 | 35 |
| Momentum | 27 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 317 | 454 |
| Forks | 521 | 124 |
| Public repos | 85 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 2 |
| External contributors | 21 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 32 |