mParticle by Rokt vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
mParticle by Rokt and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | mParticle by Rokt | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 35 |
| Code | 59 | 30 |
| Education | 63 | 66 |
| Community | 38 | 13 |
| Reach | 28 | 39 |
| Momentum | 27 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 317 | 879 |
| Forks | 521 | 117 |
| Public repos | 85 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 3 |
| External contributors | 21 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 21 |