Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

mParticle by Rokt vs UXPin

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

mParticle by Rokt and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.

mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricmParticle by RoktUXPin
Ranking
Overall rank#338#569
Pillars
Overall4335
Code5930
Education6366
Community3813
Reach2839
Momentum2734
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars317879
Forks521117
Public repos8525
Active repos (90d)143
External contributors210
Avg polish6223
Avg AI-readiness5021

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View mParticle by Rokt developer profileView UXPin developer profile