mParticle by Rokt vs Workable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
mParticle by Rokt and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
mParticle by Rokt carries 317 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
mParticle by Rokt is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Workable looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | mParticle by Rokt | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 35 |
| Code | 59 | 51 |
| Education | 63 | 56 |
| Community | 38 | 24 |
| Reach | 28 | 41 |
| Momentum | 27 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 317 | 785 |
| Forks | 521 | 135 |
| Public repos | 85 | 96 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 5 |
| External contributors | 21 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 49 |