n8n - Workflow Automation vs Plausible Analytics

n8n - Workflow Automation (Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool.) and Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

n8n - Workflow Automation (rank #82) holds a modest lead over Plausible Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (57 vs 43). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Plausible Analytics is ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), n8n - Workflow Automation is ahead of Plausible Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is slightly ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), n8n - Workflow Automation is ahead of Plausible Analytics.

n8n - Workflow Automation carries 216,785 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 155 external contributors on record. Plausible Analytics shows 31,145 stars across 21 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but n8n - Workflow Automation's footprint is roughly 7.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

n8n - Workflow Automation is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Plausible Analytics looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.