n8n - Workflow Automation vs Razorpay

n8n - Workflow Automation (Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool.) and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a narrow lead over n8n - Workflow Automation (rank #82) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 57). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), n8n - Workflow Automation is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), n8n - Workflow Automation is ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation.

n8n - Workflow Automation carries 216,785 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 155 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but n8n - Workflow Automation's footprint is roughly 56.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

n8n - Workflow Automation is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.