n8n - Workflow Automation vs Recurly

n8n - Workflow Automation (Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool.) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

n8n - Workflow Automation (rank #82) holds a modest lead over Recurly (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (57 vs 44). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is clearly ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), n8n - Workflow Automation is clearly ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), n8n - Workflow Automation is ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), n8n - Workflow Automation is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is slightly ahead of n8n - Workflow Automation.

n8n - Workflow Automation carries 216,785 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 155 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but n8n - Workflow Automation's footprint is roughly 138.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

n8n - Workflow Automation is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.