Okta, Inc vs Quo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Okta, Inc and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a meaningful lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 33). The gap of 25 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of Okta, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Quo.
Okta, Inc carries 6,250 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 44 repositories active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Okta, Inc's footprint is roughly 520.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Okta, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Quo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Okta, Inc | Quo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #73 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 58 | 33 |
| Code | 66 | 32 |
| Education | 77 | 43 |
| Community | 42 | 11 |
| Reach | 29 | 44 |
| Momentum | 45 | 41 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,250 | 12 |
| Forks | 5,038 | 1 |
| Public repos | 88 | 20 |
| Active repos (90d) | 44 | 2 |
| External contributors | 52 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 28 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 39 |