Okta, Inc vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Okta, Inc and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a modest lead over Recurly (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 44). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is slightly ahead of Okta, Inc. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Okta, Inc is ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is ahead of Okta, Inc.
Okta, Inc carries 6,250 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 44 repositories active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Okta, Inc's footprint is roughly 4.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Okta, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Okta, Inc | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #73 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 58 | 44 |
| Code | 66 | 68 |
| Education | 77 | 57 |
| Community | 42 | 34 |
| Reach | 29 | 7 |
| Momentum | 45 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,250 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 5,038 | 700 |
| Public repos | 88 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 44 | 26 |
| External contributors | 52 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 37 |