Okta, Inc vs Zulip
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Okta, Inc and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a meaningful lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 36). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Zulip. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zulip is slightly ahead of Okta, Inc. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Zulip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Zulip.
Okta, Inc carries 6,250 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 44 repositories active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zulip's footprint is roughly 5.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Okta, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zulip looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Okta, Inc | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #73 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 58 | 36 |
| Code | 66 | 64 |
| Education | 77 | 49 |
| Community | 42 | 47 |
| Reach | 29 | 25 |
| Momentum | 45 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,250 | 32,299 |
| Forks | 5,038 | 14,237 |
| Public repos | 88 | 67 |
| Active repos (90d) | 44 | 9 |
| External contributors | 52 | 76 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 38 |