Onfido vs Userlike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Onfido and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Onfido (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Userlike (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 35). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Userlike is slightly ahead of Onfido. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is ahead of Onfido. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Onfido is ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Onfido is ahead of Userlike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Onfido is ahead of Userlike.
Onfido carries 1,268 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Onfido's footprint is roughly 33.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Onfido is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Onfido | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 35 |
| Code | 42 | 43 |
| Education | 71 | 85 |
| Community | 23 | 12 |
| Reach | 35 | 20 |
| Momentum | 27 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,268 | 38 |
| Forks | 777 | 5 |
| Public repos | 85 | 14 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 36 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 35 |