Onfido vs The Washington Post
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Onfido and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Onfido (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over The Washington Post (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 37). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Onfido. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Onfido is clearly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Onfido is slightly ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is ahead of Onfido. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Onfido is ahead of The Washington Post.
Onfido carries 1,268 GitHub stars across 85 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Onfido is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. The Washington Post looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Onfido | The Washington Post |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 37 |
| Code | 42 | 50 |
| Education | 71 | 49 |
| Community | 23 | 18 |
| Reach | 35 | 50 |
| Momentum | 27 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,268 | 2,751 |
| Forks | 777 | 1,061 |
| Public repos | 85 | 91 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 30 |