Open edX vs Recharge, Inc

Open edX (The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.) and Recharge, Inc (Our mission is to make repeat orders easier for everyone.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Open edX (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Recharge, Inc (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 31). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open edX is clearly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recharge, Inc is clearly ahead of Open edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Open edX is clearly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Open edX is slightly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Open edX is clearly ahead of Recharge, Inc.

Open edX carries 10,654 GitHub stars across 186 public repos, with 100 repositories active in the last 90 days and 91 external contributors on record. Recharge, Inc shows 9 stars across 13 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Open edX's footprint is roughly 1183.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Open edX is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Recharge, Inc looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.