Quo vs Semrush

Quo (World's best business phone app) and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Semrush (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Semrush is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of Semrush. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is slightly ahead of Semrush.

Quo carries 12 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Semrush's footprint is roughly 37.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Quo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Semrush looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.