Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Quo vs Perk

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Quo (World's best business phone app) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Perk (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 33). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Perk is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Perk is ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of Perk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is slightly ahead of Quo.

Quo carries 12 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Quo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Perk looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricQuoPerk
Ranking
Overall rank#625#372
Pillars
Overall3342
Code3244
Education4354
Community1138
Reach4430
Momentum4148
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1234
Forks111
Public repos2025
Active repos (90d)25
External contributors06
Avg polish2833
Avg AI-readiness3938

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Quo developer profileView Perk developer profile