World's best business phone app
Quo vs Perk
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Quo (World's best business phone app) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Perk (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 33). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Perk is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Perk is ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of Perk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is slightly ahead of Quo.
Quo carries 12 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Quo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Perk looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Quo | Perk |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 42 |
| Code | 32 | 44 |
| Education | 43 | 54 |
| Community | 11 | 38 |
| Reach | 44 | 30 |
| Momentum | 41 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 12 | 34 |
| Forks | 1 | 11 |
| Public repos | 20 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 5 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 33 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 38 |