World's best business phone app
Quo vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Quo (World's best business phone app) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 33). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Typeform is slightly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is slightly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is ahead of Typeform.
Quo carries 12 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 49.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Quo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Quo | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 50 |
| Code | 32 | 71 |
| Education | 43 | 51 |
| Community | 11 | 25 |
| Reach | 44 | 43 |
| Momentum | 41 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 12 | 590 |
| Forks | 1 | 254 |
| Public repos | 20 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 8 |
| External contributors | 0 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 38 |