World's best business phone app
Quo vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Quo (World's best business phone app) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Quo is slightly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UXPin is slightly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is slightly ahead of UXPin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is slightly ahead of UXPin.
Quo carries 12 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UXPin's footprint is roughly 73.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Quo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UXPin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Quo | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 35 |
| Code | 32 | 30 |
| Education | 43 | 66 |
| Community | 11 | 13 |
| Reach | 44 | 39 |
| Momentum | 41 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 12 | 879 |
| Forks | 1 | 117 |
| Public repos | 20 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 3 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 21 |