Orca Security vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Orca Security and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Orca Security (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Orca Security. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Orca Security. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Orca Security is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is slightly ahead of Orca Security. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Qonto.
Orca Security carries 230 GitHub stars across 35 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Orca Security is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Orca Security | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 43 |
| Code | 40 | 57 |
| Education | 57 | 75 |
| Community | 37 | 25 |
| Reach | 21 | 24 |
| Momentum | 59 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 230 | 501 |
| Forks | 73 | 158 |
| Public repos | 35 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 11 |
| External contributors | 12 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 36 |