ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company vs Remote

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (Open, federated file sync & share. The original Enterprise File Sync and Share. AI-contributions welcome.) and Remote (Remote helps with international payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance for businesses big and small!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Remote (rank #278) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 46). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Remote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Remote is clearly ahead of ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is ahead of Remote. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Remote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Remote.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company carries 18,930 GitHub stars across 178 public repos, with 100 repositories active in the last 90 days and 35 external contributors on record. Remote shows 811 stars across 51 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company's footprint is roughly 23.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Remote looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.