ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company vs Typeform

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (Open, federated file sync & share. The original Enterprise File Sync and Share. AI-contributions welcome.) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Typeform (rank #189) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 50). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is slightly ahead of Typeform. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is slightly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Typeform.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company carries 18,930 GitHub stars across 178 public repos, with 100 repositories active in the last 90 days and 35 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company's footprint is roughly 32.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.