Paddle vs segment
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Paddle and segment both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Paddle (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over segment (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 35). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is clearly ahead of segment. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), segment is slightly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is clearly ahead of segment. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), segment is clearly ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Paddle is clearly ahead of segment.
Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. segment shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. segment looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Paddle | segment |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 35 |
| Code | 61 | 0 |
| Education | 57 | 60 |
| Community | 41 | 11 |
| Reach | 23 | 57 |
| Momentum | 34 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 997 | 0 |
| Forks | 650 | 0 |
| Public repos | 54 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 0 |
| External contributors | 6 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 63 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 0 |