Opensource SDKs for the Smartsheet collaborative work management platform
Paddle vs Smartsheet
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Paddle and Smartsheet (Opensource SDKs for the Smartsheet collaborative work management platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Smartsheet (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Paddle (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 42). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is ahead of Smartsheet. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Smartsheet is clearly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is slightly ahead of Smartsheet. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Smartsheet is ahead of Paddle.
Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Smartsheet shows 150 stars across 11 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Paddle's footprint is roughly 6.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Smartsheet looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Paddle | Smartsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 43 |
| Code | 61 | 44 |
| Education | 57 | 85 |
| Community | 41 | 38 |
| Reach | 23 | 35 |
| Momentum | 34 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 997 | 150 |
| Forks | 650 | 144 |
| Public repos | 54 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 8 |
| External contributors | 6 | 15 |
| Avg polish | 63 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 39 |