Paddle vs SolarWinds
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Paddle and SolarWinds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Paddle (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over SolarWinds (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 35). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is slightly ahead of SolarWinds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Paddle is slightly ahead of SolarWinds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is slightly ahead of SolarWinds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SolarWinds is ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of Paddle.
Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. SolarWinds shows 1,101 stars across 104 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors.
Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. SolarWinds looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Paddle | SolarWinds |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 35 |
| Code | 61 | 54 |
| Education | 57 | 50 |
| Community | 41 | 33 |
| Reach | 23 | 34 |
| Momentum | 34 | 62 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 997 | 1,101 |
| Forks | 650 | 471 |
| Public repos | 54 | 104 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 35 |
| External contributors | 6 | 18 |
| Avg polish | 63 | 56 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 38 |