Paddle vs Swiggy

Paddle and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Paddle (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Paddle is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is ahead of Swiggy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Paddle is slightly ahead of Swiggy.

Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Paddle's footprint is roughly 3.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Swiggy makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.