World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Paddle vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Paddle and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Paddle (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 42). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Paddle is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Paddle | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 48 |
| Code | 61 | 58 |
| Education | 57 | 59 |
| Community | 41 | 37 |
| Reach | 23 | 47 |
| Momentum | 34 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 997 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 650 | 384 |
| Public repos | 54 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 14 |
| External contributors | 6 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 63 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 38 |