Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Paddle vs Typeform

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Paddle and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Paddle (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 42). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Paddle. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Paddle is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Paddle is slightly ahead of Typeform.

Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricPaddleTypeform
Ranking
Overall rank#372#189
Pillars
Overall4250
Code6171
Education5751
Community4125
Reach2343
Momentum3431
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars997590
Forks650254
Public repos5440
Active repos (90d)228
External contributors65
Avg polish6375
Avg AI-readiness4038

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Paddle developer profileView Typeform developer profile