Paddle vs UXPin

Paddle and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Paddle (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 35). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Paddle.

Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.