Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Paddle vs Wistia

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Paddle and Wistia (One place for all your team’s video-ing) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Wistia (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over Paddle (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 42). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is ahead of Wistia. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wistia is ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is ahead of Wistia. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wistia is ahead of Paddle.

Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Wistia shows 680 stars across 173 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wistia looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricPaddleWistia
Ranking
Overall rank#372#278
Pillars
Overall4246
Code6145
Education5777
Community4121
Reach2340
Momentum3434
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars997680
Forks650173
Public repos54173
Active repos (90d)2223
External contributors62
Avg polish6343
Avg AI-readiness4029

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Paddle developer profileView Wistia developer profile