Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Paddle vs Zscaler, Inc.

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Paddle and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Paddle (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 42). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Paddle. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Paddle.

Paddle carries 997 GitHub stars across 54 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.

Paddle is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricPaddleZscaler, Inc.
Ranking
Overall rank#372#298
Pillars
Overall4245
Code6176
Education5765
Community4139
Reach2337
Momentum3440
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars997337
Forks650199
Public repos5458
Active repos (90d)2233
External contributors611
Avg polish6386
Avg AI-readiness4061

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Paddle developer profileView Zscaler, Inc. developer profile