We ensure each day is safer and more secure than the one before.
Palo Alto Networks vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Palo Alto Networks (We ensure each day is safer and more secure than the one before.) and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Palo Alto Networks (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 33). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Palo Alto Networks is ahead of Sage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Palo Alto Networks is slightly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Palo Alto Networks is ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Palo Alto Networks is clearly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Palo Alto Networks is clearly ahead of Sage.
Palo Alto Networks carries 6,403 GitHub stars across 525 public repos, with 66 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
Palo Alto Networks is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Palo Alto Networks | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 33 |
| Code | 73 | 56 |
| Education | 60 | 52 |
| Community | 45 | 34 |
| Reach | 45 | 23 |
| Momentum | 78 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,403 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 3,885 | 430 |
| Public repos | 525 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 66 | 6 |
| External contributors | 13 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 86 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 38 |