We ensure each day is safer and more secure than the one before.
Palo Alto Networks vs Zendesk
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Palo Alto Networks (We ensure each day is safer and more secure than the one before.) and Zendesk both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Palo Alto Networks (rank #93) holds a narrow lead over Zendesk (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 51). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Palo Alto Networks is ahead of Zendesk. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Palo Alto Networks is slightly ahead of Zendesk. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Palo Alto Networks is slightly ahead of Zendesk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Palo Alto Networks is clearly ahead of Zendesk.
Palo Alto Networks carries 6,403 GitHub stars across 525 public repos, with 66 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Zendesk shows 12,427 stars across 891 public repos, 87 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.
Palo Alto Networks is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zendesk makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Palo Alto Networks | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #165 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 51 |
| Code | 73 | 57 |
| Education | 60 | 52 |
| Community | 45 | 45 |
| Reach | 45 | 38 |
| Momentum | 78 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,403 | 12,427 |
| Forks | 3,885 | 3,361 |
| Public repos | 525 | 891 |
| Active repos (90d) | 66 | 87 |
| External contributors | 13 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 86 | 54 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 40 |