World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Patreon vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Patreon and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Patreon (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 36). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Patreon. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Patreon is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is ahead of Teamwork.com. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Patreon.
Patreon carries 846 GitHub stars across 62 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Patreon is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Teamwork.com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Patreon | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 48 |
| Code | 52 | 58 |
| Education | 63 | 59 |
| Community | 26 | 37 |
| Reach | 61 | 47 |
| Momentum | 0 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 846 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 220 | 384 |
| Public repos | 62 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 14 |
| External contributors | 2 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 38 |