pCloud Open Source vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
pCloud Open Source and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), pCloud Open Source is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is ahead of pCloud Open Source.
pCloud Open Source carries 867 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
pCloud Open Source is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | pCloud Open Source | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 43 |
| Code | 39 | 57 |
| Education | 64 | 75 |
| Community | 27 | 25 |
| Reach | 55 | 24 |
| Momentum | 12 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 867 | 501 |
| Forks | 285 | 158 |
| Public repos | 16 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 11 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 36 |