pCloud Open Source vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
pCloud Open Source and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a modest lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of pCloud Open Source.
pCloud Open Source carries 867 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
pCloud Open Source is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | pCloud Open Source | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 42 |
| Code | 39 | 59 |
| Education | 64 | 52 |
| Community | 27 | 42 |
| Reach | 55 | 23 |
| Momentum | 12 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 867 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 285 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 16 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 31 |
| External contributors | 2 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 48 |