pCloud Open Source vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
pCloud Open Source and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sage (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of Sage.
pCloud Open Source carries 868 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,183 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
pCloud Open Source is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sage looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | pCloud Open Source | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #668 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 33 |
| Code | 39 | 56 |
| Education | 64 | 52 |
| Community | 27 | 34 |
| Reach | 55 | 23 |
| Momentum | 12 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 868 | 2,183 |
| Forks | 285 | 429 |
| Public repos | 16 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 6 |
| External contributors | 2 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 38 |