pCloud Open Source vs Sprout Social
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
pCloud Open Source and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sprout Social (rank #401) holds a modest lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sprout Social is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Sprout Social. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Sprout Social. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Sprout Social. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of pCloud Open Source.
pCloud Open Source carries 867 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
pCloud Open Source is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | pCloud Open Source | Sprout Social |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 41 |
| Code | 39 | 48 |
| Education | 64 | 52 |
| Community | 27 | 17 |
| Reach | 55 | 41 |
| Momentum | 12 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 867 | 313 |
| Forks | 285 | 122 |
| Public repos | 16 | 68 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 4 |
| External contributors | 2 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 30 |