Pendo vs SoundCloud
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Pendo and SoundCloud both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SoundCloud (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Pendo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SoundCloud is ahead of Pendo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pendo is slightly ahead of SoundCloud. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SoundCloud is clearly ahead of Pendo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SoundCloud is ahead of Pendo.
Pendo carries 267 GitHub stars across 134 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. SoundCloud shows 8,606 stars across 56 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but SoundCloud's footprint is roughly 32.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Pendo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. SoundCloud looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Pendo | SoundCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 36 |
| Code | 27 | 42 |
| Education | 61 | 61 |
| Community | 47 | 39 |
| Reach | 23 | 45 |
| Momentum | 31 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 267 | 8,606 |
| Forks | 88 | 1,142 |
| Public repos | 134 | 56 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 17 |
| External contributors | 6 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 18 | 32 |