Pinterest vs Thomson Reuters

Pinterest (Pinterest's Open Source Projects) and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Pinterest (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Thomson Reuters (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 33). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Pinterest is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Pinterest. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pinterest is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Pinterest. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Pinterest is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters.

Pinterest carries 30,737 GitHub stars across 98 public repos, with 37 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 436 stars across 143 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Pinterest's footprint is roughly 70.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Pinterest is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Thomson Reuters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.