Plausible Analytics vs Qonto

Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Plausible Analytics and Qonto sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Plausible Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is slightly ahead of Plausible Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Qonto.

Plausible Analytics carries 31,145 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Plausible Analytics's footprint is roughly 62.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Plausible Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.