Plausible Analytics vs Razorpay

Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Plausible Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 43). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Plausible Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Plausible Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Plausible Analytics.

Plausible Analytics carries 31,145 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Plausible Analytics's footprint is roughly 8.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Plausible Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.