Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.
Plausible Analytics vs Zulip
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Plausible Analytics (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 36). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zulip is slightly ahead of Plausible Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Zulip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Zulip.
Plausible Analytics carries 31,145 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors.
Plausible Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zulip looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Plausible Analytics | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 36 |
| Code | 56 | 64 |
| Education | 69 | 49 |
| Community | 59 | 47 |
| Reach | 49 | 25 |
| Momentum | 38 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 31,145 | 32,299 |
| Forks | 2,557 | 14,237 |
| Public repos | 21 | 67 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 9 |
| External contributors | 23 | 76 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 38 |